 |
 |
 |
 |
03/10/2005 |
| |
| |
| |
Most of the solutions proposed by engineers
to address energy waste are little more than tinkering at
the margins. First we have to get the basics right, says
Mike Malina*.
At the recent NEMEX show in Birmingham, it was clear that
this industry has something of an obsession with measuring
things. Metering companies far outnumbered other kinds of
product suppliers and there was a positive battalion of energy
advisers keen to show end users how they could reduce their
energy bills by switching tariffs.
These things are very important and much of our efforts should
be focused on measuring and monitoring to find where all
this expensive energy is going and then finding ways to manage
down the waste and cost. The trouble is that should be Stage
Two, and we haven’t cracked Stage One yet.
Before we start ‘tweaking’, there are some pretty
fundamental design issues that need to be faced first and
which could make an enormous difference in almost every building.
Commissioning specialists like Commtech are regularly called
in to analyse what is happening in buildings all over the
country. In most cases, we find that energy consumption is
far above design levels and even further above where it could
be.
The reason is that most building services are either never
properly (or at all) commissioned or have long fallen out
of their best operating parameters due to poor maintenance
or neglect.
A basic examination of the air and water systems will show,
in most cases, that they are catastrophically out of balance.
This is fundamental and relatively easy to put right if you
call in the right people.
Having your main services unbalanced means your heating system,
for example, will only operate in patches with hot water
failing to reach all areas of the occupied zones. This will
encourage individual users to turn up room thermostats and
radiator valves in a doomed attempt to improve their conditions.
All they will do is drive up energy costs.
Again if the air services are out of kilter, ventilation
fans will be overworking to try and redress the balance and
air conditioning systems will be consuming enormous amounts
of electricity without delivering the controlled conditions
expected by users. How many times have we seen the indiscriminate
use of supplementary fan heaters. This certainly gives you
more electricity to measure!
In short, your building will overheat in some areas, be subject
to drafts and freezing conditions in others and the occupier
will have a less than healthy and happy staff, so consequently
you pay more to cool and heat and productivity suffers.
Not delivering
Commissioning engineers can almost sense where the problems
are simply by walking into an unbalanced building. They can
feel where the airflows are not as they should be, but putting
that right takes a bit of technical expertise and a lot of
patience. End users could also do with a bit of basic building
services education. Why do people behave so irrationally
at work compared to their own homes when it comes to controlling
temperature and ventilation?
Many commissioning firms find that building managers and
FMs are simply at a loss to understand why their highly specified
heating and air conditioning systems are not delivering the
required comfort conditions. Do many of them even understand
the concept of balancing and would they be able to point
out a services riser to you, for example?
By applying their engineering skills and adjusting valves
and dampers, commissioning companies can relatively quickly
put a building back on a balanced footing. As a result the
building will be more energy efficient with the desired indoor
climate conditions being achieved, and importantly a more
productive happier workforce.
Proper balancing also avoids the extra costs incurred when
individual users try to intervene to correct a system that
is beyond correction due to poor air and water flows.
Financial directors would squirm with embarrassment if they
could get their heads round this subject. Every pound saved
on energy goes directly to the bottom line at a time when
businesses are complaining that they will have to increase
their turnover to keep up with rising gas and electricity
prices.
Commtech has seen an increase of up to 40% efficiency in
some of the buildings we have rebalanced. Imagine the impact
across all sectors in the UK if a comprehensive assessment
is made of checking the entire building stock. This is a
fundamental approach that industry and government seem to
have missed in our battle to combat global warming. We accept
that our car has to have an MOT, and be tuned for optimal
performance, so why not our buildings?
Oil prices are expected to remain above $60 according to
suppliers like Shell and BP. So, taking action now makes
sound business sense not to mention the PR benefit firms
gain by improving their ‘Green Credentials’.
Investing in energy management is basic economics with a
potential rate of return in the region of 25 – 30%
over a period of three to five years. Try getting that kind
of money back from the stock market! Companies should forget
about investing in shares for a while and pump that money
into reducing their energy costs.
FTSE 100 companies are already obliged to produce energy
reports and that will soon be extended to the top 350. This
factor, allied to rising fuel costs, the impact of the Climate
Change Levy (likely to rise from 11% to a 16% surcharge on
energy bills in the future) and growing pressure from environmental
groups means big business is rapidly running out of options.
Investment decisions
The EU Energy Performance of Buildings directive will pile
further pressure on building owners and managers when it
comes into force next year (although there will probably
be a three year moratorium while we get our act together).
They will not be able to ignore the requirements of this
legislation, which includes the need for all buildings over
1,000 m2 to display an energy label. This will have an impact
on investment decisions because you will not be able to let
or sell your building without one.
The UK is using the revised Part L of the Building Regulations
to move towards many of the targets set by the directive.
Air tightness and ventilation leakage testing as well as
full and comprehensive commissioning will be major improvements
brought about by the directive and it is through this process
that systems can be brought back into balance.
Once that is sorted out, building services consultants can
look at improving the overall performance of a building on
a much sounder footing. The use of the ‘whole building
approach’ outlined under Part L will allow designers
to ‘mix and match’ fabric measures, lighting
and hvac controls as well as being encouraged to design in
renewable energy systems such as CHP because they are aiming
at an overall goal of reduced carbon emissions for their
building.
Heated and naturally ventilated buildings will have to improve
their carbon emissions performance by 25% and mechanically
ventilated buildings by 30% under the new regulations. Building
owners will also be required to spend a further 10% on top
of their planned refurbishments to upgrade energy systems
with the aim of delivering a payback in less than seven years.
The solutions are there for both the short and long-term,
but none of this makes any sense if the fundamentals of how
a building runs are not examined first. Get the basics right,
which means checking your building is well balanced and everything
else can follow. Then it makes sense to start tweaking at
the margins.
*Mike Malina is Manager of the Energy Division of The Commtech
Group
For more information contact:
Commtech Group,
Breakfield
The Ullswater Business Park
Coulsdon
Surrey
CR5 2HS
Tel: 020 8668 0312
Fax. 020 8668 0975
enquiry@commtechgroup.co.uk
www.thecommtechgroup.com
Copyright 2004 Commtech Group -
by wickedweb.co.uk
|
 |